P&L
Executive profitability comparison across sales, COGS, labor, prime cost, controllables, and EBITDA.
| Store | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GreenwoodSofia Diaz | |||||||
| ZionsvilleTheo Bennett | |||||||
| CarmelAvery Collins | |||||||
| NoblesvilleElena Martin | |||||||
| FishersMia Graham | |||||||
| WestfieldCamden Reed | |||||||
| Downtown IndyNolan Price | |||||||
| Broad RippleJordan Lee |
P&L Workspace
Rearrange profitability views and open the larger interactive store P&L widget.
EBITDA % by StoreProfitability ranking by location
EBITDA % by Store
Carmel12.8% 3
Fishers9.2% 5
Broad Ripple6.1% 8
Downtown Indy8.4% 7
Greenwood15.6% 1
Westfield8.8% 6
Noblesville11.7% 4
Zionsville14.9% 2
Profit TrendSeven-day EBITDA trend
Profit Trend
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
10.8% latestPrime Cost by StoreFood plus labor pressure
Prime Cost by Store
Carmel59.2% 5
Fishers62.6% 6
Broad Ripple65% 8
Downtown Indy63% 7
Greenwood54.6% 2
Westfield59% 4
Noblesville57.2% 3
Zionsville52.5% 1
Expense MixFood, labor, and controllables
Expense Mix
Carmel
Fishers
Broad Ripple
Downtown Indy
Greenwood
Westfield
Noblesville
Zionsville
Other ControllablesNon-prime operating cost pressure
Other Controllables
Carmel13.8% 4
Fishers15.2% 6
Broad Ripple16.9% 8
Downtown Indy15.6% 7
Greenwood12.2% 1
Westfield14.9% 5
Noblesville13.4% 3
Zionsville12.8% 2
EBITDA DollarsWeekly dollar profit estimate
EBITDA Dollars
Carmel$7,544 2
Fishers$4,915 6
Broad Ripple$2,878 8
Downtown Indy$5,234 5
Greenwood$7,998 1
Westfield$3,860 7
Noblesville$5,759 4
Zionsville$5,929 3
Biggest P&L MoversWhat changed most this period
| Store | Move | Driver |
|---|---|---|
| Greenwood | +1.9 pts | Prime cost |
| Broad Ripple | -2.2 pts | Food + reviews |
| Carmel | +1.4 pts | Sales lift |
| Fishers | -0.8 pts | Labor |
P&L SignalsPractical operator readout
Greenwood is the cleanest profitability model for the group.
Broad Ripple needs food cost and labor control before EBITDA can recover.
Downtown Indy sales are strong, but food cost is limiting profit flow-through.
Zionsville proves lower-volume stores can still protect margin.
Interactive Store P&LSelect year and period. YTD follows the selected period.
Carmel P&L ReviewClick any store in the table above to swap this statement.
| Line Item | P3 | % Sales | YTD Through P3 | YTD % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Sales | $240,475 | 101.8% | $681,346 | 101.8% |
| Discounts | -$4,329 | 1.8% | -$12,264 | 1.8% |
| Net Sales | $236,146 | 100% | $669,082 | 100% |
| Food COGS | -$68,010 | 28.8% | -$192,696 | 28.8% |
| Beverage COGS | -$14,641 | 6.2% | -$41,483 | 6.2% |
| Packaging | -$7,321 | 3.1% | -$20,742 | 3.1% |
| Labor | -$71,788 | 30.4% | -$203,400 | 30.4% |
| Payroll Taxes / Benefits | -$9,332 | 4% | -$26,442 | 4% |
| Prime Cost | -$171,092 | 72.5% | -$484,763 | 72.5% |
| Occupancy | -$9,200 | 3.9% | -$27,600 | 4.1% |
| Utilities | -$7,321 | 3.1% | -$20,742 | 3.1% |
| Repairs / Maintenance | -$2,834 | 1.2% | -$8,029 | 1.2% |
| Marketing | -$4,959 | 2.1% | -$14,051 | 2.1% |
| Merchant Fees | -$6,848 | 2.9% | -$19,403 | 2.9% |
| Other Controllables | -$8,265 | 3.5% | -$23,418 | 3.5% |
| EBITDA | $25,627 | 10.9% | $71,076 | 10.6% |